|
|
Post by Sheddy on Apr 11, 2013 17:08:25 GMT -5
Hawks Trade:
Al Horford
Louis Williams
2012 1st
2014 1st
Lakers Trade:
Dwight Howard
This trade just doesnt do it for me. I think the Lakers should have gotten more, but at least they get some youth. Hawks improving
|
|
|
|
Post by Coltsown4show on Apr 11, 2013 17:14:33 GMT -5
:facepalm: :smh:
I offered
Paul George
ROY HIBBERT
And a pick, which could of been picks
Lmao what an awful Howard deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Apr 11, 2013 17:20:58 GMT -5
I got my eyes on a couple guys if the Hawks season goes south  I like it |
|
|
|
Post by julekstep on Apr 11, 2013 17:21:24 GMT -5
if DH and josh smith wont resign with hawks then 2014 pick can be of super value imho
|
|
rybee
Rookie GM
Posts: 21 
|
Post by rybee on Apr 11, 2013 17:23:16 GMT -5
if DH and josh smith wont resign with hawks then 2014 pick can be of super value imho I believe Andrew Wiggins is in that draft class as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Sheddy on Apr 11, 2013 17:24:15 GMT -5
Still wouldve taken George and Hibbert but thats why I'm not GM
|
|
|
|
Post by Coltsown4show on Apr 11, 2013 17:24:35 GMT -5
So putting your hopes on these two guys not resigning makes his 2014 valuable? That is just dumb.
|
|
|
|
Post by golakers on Apr 11, 2013 17:25:03 GMT -5
I got what I could for Howard. Since it was made clear over the last 24 hours. That he wanted out.
|
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Apr 11, 2013 17:25:20 GMT -5
if DH and josh smith wont resign with hawks then 2014 pick can be of super value imho exactly why the Lakers probably didn't get more, if Dwight was on a longer deal then it would be a bad trade, but now the Hawks are really gambling on this season. |
|
|
|
Post by Coltsown4show on Apr 11, 2013 17:26:25 GMT -5
I got what I could for Howard. Since it was made clear over the last 24 hours. That he wanted out. Well you took the wrong deal IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by Sheddy on Apr 11, 2013 17:28:53 GMT -5
Hey, he took the deal. No hostility here
|
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Apr 11, 2013 17:31:06 GMT -5
Still wouldve taken George and Hibbert but thats why I'm not GM Lakers are in salary hell, if they take that deal they would just end up dumping Hibbert in the future and not resigning George (who would probably demand max). It might not have been the better option, but it was the cheaper option and that's probably the route the Lakers will have to go until they clear enough salary. |
|
|
|
Post by Coltsown4show on Apr 11, 2013 17:35:19 GMT -5
Still wouldve taken George and Hibbert but thats why I'm not GM Lakers are in salary hell, if they take that deal they would just end up dumping Hibbert in the future and not resigning George (who would probably demand max). It might not have been the better option, but it was the cheaper option and that's probably the route the Lakers will have to go until they clear enough salary. Taking my deal would of actually been less money spent for the Lakers now... Kobe comes off the books when George would be getting his nex contract which is what 13m first year max for first free agency contract? So the salary cap point is moot. They are still in cap hell. |
|
|
|
Post by Sheddy on Apr 11, 2013 17:35:24 GMT -5
PIstons makes a very valid point as well
|
|
|
|
Post by somerandomguy on Apr 11, 2013 17:42:43 GMT -5
Lakers are in salary hell, if they take that deal they would just end up dumping Hibbert in the future and not resigning George (who would probably demand max). It might not have been the better option, but it was the cheaper option and that's probably the route the Lakers will have to go until they clear enough salary. Taking my deal would of actually been less money spent for the Lakers now... Kobe comes off the books when George would be getting his nex contract which is what 13m first year max for first free agency contract? So the salary cap point is moot. They are still in cap hell. I guess, maybe it was the 1st then since the Hawks are taking a bigger risk then you are (even if you lost Dwight, you still have Granger, Hawks best player under contract next year is Teague). If the Hawks really screw up they would easily be a bottom feeding team next year unless they got something else (if there is anything else besides Smoove and Dwight). And that means Wiggins/Parker or Randle for the Lakers. I don't really know why they didn't accept, but I don't think the dropoff is really horrible if what your saying is true. |
|
